Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Guillaume Smet
Тема Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances
Дата
Msg-id 1d4e0c10712260741w1f141fd6x2f482143d526ad48@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances  ("Pavel Stehule" <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances  ("Guillaume Smet" <guillaume.smet@gmail.com>)
Re: More shared buffers causes lower performances  (Greg Smith <gsmith@gregsmith.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
On Dec 26, 2007 12:21 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> bgwriter_lru_maxpages = 0
>
> So we can see if the bgwriter has any hand in this?

It doesn't change the behaviour I have.

It's not checkpointing either as using pgbench-tools, I can see that
tps and latency are quite stable during the entire run. Btw, thanks
Greg for these nice tools.

I thought it may be some sort of lock contention so I made a few tests
with -N but I have the same behaviour.

Then I decided to perform read-only tests using -S option (pgbench -S
-s 100 -c 16 -t 30000 -U postgres bench). And still the same
behaviour:
shared_buffers=64MB : 20k tps
shared_buffers=1024MB : 8k tps

Any other idea?

--
Guillaume

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bill Moran
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10
Следующее
От: Mark Mielke
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: With 4 disks should I go for RAID 5 or RAID 10