Re: log_duration is redundant, no?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Guillaume Smet
Тема Re: log_duration is redundant, no?
Дата
Msg-id 1d4e0c10609071604k79c56253q3441f41cf856a736@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: log_duration is redundant, no?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 9/8/06, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> I think his basic complaint is that doing the full logging pushup for
> even short-duration queries is too expensive, and that logging only the
> duration and not the query text or parameters makes a significant speed
> difference.  I'm not at all sure that I buy that, but if it's true then
> subsequent filtering obviously doesn't help.

That's exactly my point. And on our highly loaded servers, the
log_duration behaviour makes the difference between:
- we have a clear overview of the server activity and
- we don't have any idea of what happens on this server (apart that
there are queries slower than X ms).

Regards,

--
Guillaume


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: elein
Дата:
Сообщение: Domains and subtypes, a brief proposal
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: log_duration is redundant, no?