1) Hadoop file system is very optimized for mostly read operation
2) As of a few months ago, hdfs doesn't support file appending.
There might be a bit of impedance to make them go together.
However, I think it should a very good initiative to come up with ideas to be able to run postgres on distributed file system (doesn't have to be specific hadoop).
Pi Song
On Sun, Feb 22, 2009 at 7:17 AM, Paul Sheer
<paulsheer@gmail.com> wrote:
Hadoop backend for PostGreSQL....
A problem that my client has, and one that I come across often,
is that a database seems to always be associated with a particular
physical machine, a physical machine that has to be upgraded,
replaced, or otherwise maintained.
Even if the database is replicated, it just means there are two or
more machines. Replication is also a difficult thing to properly
manage.
With a distributed data store, the data would become a logical
object - no adding or removal of machines would affect the data.
This is an ideal that would remove a tremendous maintenance
burden from many sites ---- well, at least the one's I have worked
at as far as I can see.
Does anyone know of plans to implement PostGreSQL over Hadoop?
Yahoo seems to be doing this:
http://glinden.blogspot.com/2008/05/yahoo-builds-two-petabyte-postgresql.html
But they store tables column-ways for their performance situation.
If one is doing a lot of inserts I don't think this is most efficient - ?
Has Yahoo put the source code for their work online?
Many thanks for any pointers.
-paul
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers