Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies
Дата
Msg-id 199912090255.VAA03055@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на More initdb follies  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Question 3: Is there a reason why the template1 database is vacuumed twice
> in the process? Once before all the views are created (no analyze) and
> once at the very end (with analyze).

I see the line before the first vacuum:

# If the COPY is first, the VACUUM generates an error, so we vacuum first

That may have been me adding this.  Seems it is no longer an issue. 
Removed.



--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements?