Re: [HACKERS] Profiling?]

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Profiling?]
Дата
Msg-id 199909271533.LAA15302@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Profiling?  (Leon <leon@udmnet.ru>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Profiling?]  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > 
> > Yes, I have done it many times.  I profile that postgres process, not
> > the backend. 
> 
> Hmm, isn't Postgres process called backend process? AFAIK postmaster
> (it's simply a nickname to Postgres) forks itself on receiveing new
> connection request. Isn't it true? I mean that Postmaster is the same 
> binary as Postgres itself.

Yes.

> 
> > Look for this in Makefile.global:
> > 
> >         # Comment out PROFILE to generate a profile version of the binaries
> >         #PROFILE= -p -non_shared
> > 
> 
> Of course I used -p option. The problem is, when I start Postmaster,
> it complains about 'profile timer expired'. What do I do wrong?

That's strange.  I have not profiled in a while.  I wonder if the
removal of the exec() has caused this.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Lamar Owen
Дата:
Сообщение: Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] _text problem in union