On Mon, Feb 08, 1999 at 01:15:09PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> We don't reserve the type names as keywords, and because they can create
> their own types, it wouldn't make sense.
I don't exactly understand that. For instance the 'int' keyword will still
be reserved, isn't it?
> Seems like more work than it's worth, no? Why not have psql queries
> that can't be done in ecpg. Most commercial embedded sql's have a more
> limited keyword set, don't they?
I have no idea. Anyone else?
Michael
--
Michael Meskes | Go SF 49ers!
Th.-Heuss-Str. 61, D-41812 Erkelenz | Go Rhein Fire!
Tel.: (+49) 2431/72651 | Use Debian GNU/Linux!
Email: Michael.Meskes@gmx.net | Use PostgreSQL!