Re: [HACKERS] Question about postmaster processes

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Question about postmaster processes
Дата
Msg-id 199812082020.PAA17724@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Question about postmaster processes  ("Chris Williams" <chris_d_williams@itd.sterling.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Question about postmaster processes  (Hakan Kalyoncu <hk@yore.com.tr>)
Список pgsql-hackers
[Charset iso-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> Since I have upgraded to postgres 6.4, when I do a "ps -ef |
> grep post", I get a list of postmaster processes.  With 6.3.2
> of postgres, I would have one postmaster process and many
> different posgres processes.  Is this normal 6.4?  All I do is
> start the postmaster process with the -i option.  Any help would
> be great

We no longer exec() new postgres backends, but just fork the
postmaster.  Faster, but your platform doesn't seem to support 'ps'
args changes that we have made in the backend.  What platform are
you using?

To find the postmaster, just get the parent of all the postmaster-named
processes.


-- Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Chris Williams"
Дата:
Сообщение: Question about postmaster processes
Следующее
От: Brook Milligan
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposed autoconf change: rip out search for 'install'