Nag: postgresql/c.h typedefs Size as 'unsigned int' on Alpha

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Oliver Elphick
Тема Nag: postgresql/c.h typedefs Size as 'unsigned int' on Alpha
Дата
Msg-id 199812050856.IAA03942@linda.lfix.co.uk
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Nag: postgresql/c.h typedefs Size as 'unsigned int' on Alpha  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Can anyone give me an answer on this Debian bug report, please?:

Size is still defined as unsigned int in 6.4.  Paul is suggesting that this
be changed to size_t for compatibility with alpha.

Is that correct?

------- Forwarded Message

Date:    Wed, 16 Sep 1998 21:03:44 +0200
From:    Paul Slootman <paul@wurtel.demon.nl>
To:      submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#26778: postgresql-dev: postgresql/c.h typedefs Size as 'unsigned i  nt', should be 'size_t'

Package: postgresql-dev
Version: 6.3.2-11

Using the above wrong type for "Size" leads to conflicts with system
prototypes, e.g. palloc() which is apparently a define for malloc().
Replacing the "typedef unsigned int Size;" with "typedef size_t Size;"
leads to a usable system again; at least, on Alpha, where "unsigned int"
is NOT the same as "unsigned long", unlike i386.

Thanks,
Paul Slootman

- -- System Information
Debian Release: 2.0
Kernel Version: Linux alf 2.0.35 #1 Tue Aug 11 11:09:24 CEST 1998 alpha unknown

------- End of Forwarded Message

-- 
Oliver Elphick                                Oliver.Elphick@lfix.co.uk
Isle of Wight                              http://www.lfix.co.uk/oliver              PGP key from public servers; key
ID32B8FAA1                ========================================    "Go ye therefore, and teach all nations,
baptizingthem     in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the      Holy Ghost; Teaching them to observe all
things      whatsoever I have commanded you; and, lo, I am with      you alway, even unto the end of the world. Amen."
             Matthew 28:19,20 
 




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Oliver Elphick"
Дата:
Сообщение: Sorry to nag, but... [Failures with arrays]
Следующее
От: Vadim Mikheev
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] BUG ON HAVING CLAUSE