Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and more

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and more
Дата
Msg-id 199810070250.WAA07653@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump and more  (Terry Mackintosh <terry@terrym.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> Hi Jan and all
>
> On Mon, 5 Oct 1998, Jan Wieck wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >     Bruce: Would you please apply the patch at the end?
> >
> >     Terry: Sorry, but dumping views is covered completely by this
> >     approach for dumping rewrite rules.
>
> Sounds good, I really don't mind that what I did does not get used.
> For it seems that I blow on the right coal and a fire started.

I like this sentence.

> Dumping of views and such has been lacking for WAY TOO LONG.
> And it sounds like even more came out of all of this then any of us would
> have thought.

Yes, though I knew Jan had this up his sleeve, and it was on the open
items list.

I have removed the mention of the rules limitation in pg_dump man pages
and sgml.


--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle
  maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610) 853-3000
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] RE: [GENERAL] Long update query ? (also Re: [GENERAL] CNF vs. DNF)
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Open 6.4 items