Re: [HACKERS] patch for memory overrun on Linux(i386)

> >That said, I have a plan in mind to get a nice performance boost for
> palloc().
> >As a side effect, I will guarantee 8 byte alignment of pointers returned
> >from palloc().
> >
> Does this imply that more memory will be used that strictly necesary under
> linux?
>
> With regards from Maurice.

Actually, perhaps less memory, because malloc memory is not aligned on
double boundaries, but this is all still just conjecture.


--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)