Re: SCO vs. the monster macro

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: SCO vs. the monster macro
Дата
Msg-id 199803122115.QAA06535@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на SCO vs. the monster macro  (Hal Snyder <hal@vailsys.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
>
> > But we don't want that if they use a good compiler under SCO.  I have
> > asked them to run src/tools/ccsym and send the output.  Should be
> > something unique in there.
>
> On SCO, ccsym becomes /bin/cc -b elf -ii -E foo.c, which after filtering
> gives the symbols below. If I omit "-b elf", the last line is replaced
> by the two lines
> '-D_M_COFF'
> '-D_SCO_COFF'
>
> How about _SCO_DS as the define when testing for SCO's native
> compiler? (I confess ignorance as to SCO's intended use of this symbol.)

I am inclined to choose:

    -D_SCO_C_DIALECT=1

Not to test for the value of one, but just to test if it is defined.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: dg@illustra.com (David Gould)
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] SCO vs. the monster macro
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?