Re: SCO vs. the monster macro
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: SCO vs. the monster macro |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 199803122115.QAA06535@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | SCO vs. the monster macro (Hal Snyder <hal@vailsys.com>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>
> > But we don't want that if they use a good compiler under SCO. I have
> > asked them to run src/tools/ccsym and send the output. Should be
> > something unique in there.
>
> On SCO, ccsym becomes /bin/cc -b elf -ii -E foo.c, which after filtering
> gives the symbols below. If I omit "-b elf", the last line is replaced
> by the two lines
> '-D_M_COFF'
> '-D_SCO_COFF'
>
> How about _SCO_DS as the define when testing for SCO's native
> compiler? (I confess ignorance as to SCO's intended use of this symbol.)
I am inclined to choose:
-D_SCO_C_DIALECT=1
Not to test for the value of one, but just to test if it is defined.
--
Bruce Momjian | 830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
+ If your life is a hard drive, | (610) 353-9879(w)
+ Christ can be your backup. | (610) 853-3000(h)
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: