Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Hal Snyder
Тема Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c?
Дата
Msg-id 199803120404.WAA27649@crocodile.vail
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на port/getrusage.c?  (t-ishii@sra.co.jp)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c?  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
> From: t-ishii@sra.co.jp
> Date: Thu, 12 Mar 1998 11:13:54 +0900

> Does anybody know why getrusage() in backend/port/getrusage.c is
> removed (surrounded by #if 0)?
>
> Some ports including Solaris 2.4, NEWS OS 6 (I'm trying now) etc. need
> getrusage().

I have the same question - have been wrestling with the SCO (ODT 5)
port. Actually all we need here is client-side pgsql code to run on
SCO so I butchered my way thru the build to make it happen.

Used gcc-2.8.1 to get past the monster macro - altho if there's C
code we can put in for easily confused compilers it would be nice to
have a port buildable with SCO native tools. Bruce?

Additions to wishlist - client-only builds, fix setup so Pg.pm builds
on first install.

Will be happy to work with the experts on SCO port + these small
items - my hat is off to the 6.3 team.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Chris Albertson
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [QUESTIONS] Does Storage Manager support >2GB tables?
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] port/getrusage.c?