Re: [HACKERS] Rule plan size for views?

> > I hesitate to remove any of the outfuncs stuff.  It is very useful, and
> > if it is missing, things are harder to debug.  Adding the fields I did
> > helped solve several problems I had when testing subselects, and I know
> > Vadim uses that output too.  Shame it goes into the rule, but hard to
> > imagine why the rule would not need it, except for fields that are only
> > used by the parser, but I think we need to be complete.  A better
> > solution would be to allow rewrite rules to span multiple blocks, or a
> > least allow them to take the space of two blocks.
>
> Or use LO.

Yea, that makes a lot of sense.

--
Bruce Momjian                          |  830 Blythe Avenue
maillist@candle.pha.pa.us              |  Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  (610) 353-9879(w)
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  (610) 853-3000(h)