Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP
| От | Bruce Momjian |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 199801050508.AAA27861@candle.pha.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] include/config.h FOLLOWUP (The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> > On Sun, 4 Jan 1998, Bruce Momjian wrote: > > > > > > > On Mon, 5 Jan 1998, Vadim B. Mikheev wrote: > > > > > > > Just remember that Informix (and others) use 2K blocks. > > > > > > So we're 4x what the commercial ones are as of right now? > > > > That is because they do not use the file system, so they try to match > > the raw disk block sizes, while we try to match the file system size. > > Irrelevant to my question...our tuples...are they 4x the size of the > commercial vendors, or is Vadim talking about something altogether different? > > If we are 4x their size, then I think this whole discussion is a joke since > we are already *way* better then "the others" That's a good question. What is the maximum tuple size for Informix or Oracle tuples? -- Bruce Momjian maillist@candle.pha.pa.us
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: