Re: Memory leaks in record_out and record_send
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Memory leaks in record_out and record_send |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19966.1352824077@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Memory leaks in record_out and record_send (Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Memory leaks in record_out and record_send
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri@2ndQuadrant.fr> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:
>> Thoughts?
> I've been using textin(record_out(NEW)) in generic partitioning
> triggers, and you can find examples of that trick in the wiki, so I
> think we have users of that in the field.
I think explicit calls like that actually wouldn't be a problem,
since they'd be run in a per-tuple context anyway. The cases that
are problematic are hard-coded I/O function calls. I'm worried
about the ones like, say, plpgsql's built-in conversion operations.
We could probably fix printtup's usage with some confidence, but
there are a lot of other ones.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: