Re: DROP COLUMN status
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DROP COLUMN status |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19687.960493963@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: DROP COLUMN status (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
>>>> The implementation makes the dropped column invisible by
>>>> changing its attnum to -attnum - offset(currently 20) and
>>>> attnam to ("*already Dropped%d",attnum).
>>
>> Ugh. No wonder you had to hack so many places in such an ugly fashion.
>> Why not leave the attnum as-is, and just add a bool saying "column is
>> dropped" to pg_attribute? As long as the parser ignores columns marked
>> that way for field lookup and expansion of *, it seems the rest of the
>> system wouldn't need to treat dropped columns specially in any way.
> If we leave it as positive, don't we have to change user applications
> that query pg_attribute so they also know to skip it?
Good point, but I think user applications that query pg_attribute
are likely to have trouble anyway: if they're expecting a consecutive
series of attnums then they're going to lose no matter what.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: