Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions
Дата
Msg-id 19628.1485977554@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Konstantin Knizhnik <k.knizhnik@postgrespro.ru>)
Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Craig Ringer <craig@2ndquadrant.com>)
Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> Also, including the GID in the WAL for each COMMIT/ABORT PREPARED
> doesn't seem inordinately expensive to me.

I'm confused ... isn't it there already?  If not, how do we handle
reconstructing 2PC state from WAL at all?
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] multi-level partitions and partition-wise joins
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] ICU integration