Some 8.4 changes needed according to pg_migrator testing

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Some 8.4 changes needed according to pg_migrator testing
Дата
Msg-id 19614.1241712344@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: Some 8.4 changes needed according to pg_migrator testing  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Re: Some 8.4 changes needed according to pg_migrator testing  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Re: Some 8.4 changes needed according to pg_migrator testing  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
I was just talking to Bruce about his results from testing pg_migrator,
and we realized there are a couple of changes that we need to slip into
the core code before 8.4 goes final.

1. pg_dumpall dumps CREATE DATABASE commands that include the source
database's encoding, lc_collate, and lc_ctype settings ... but if
dumping from a pre-8.4 server it just omits the lc_ settings.  This
is flat-out wrong (independently of pg_migrator).  The correct behavior
when dumping from pre-8.4 is to get the server-wide locale settings
and include those in the CREATE DATABASE commands.  Otherwise you're
not restoring the full state of the database correctly.  This is
critical in view of the 8.4 changes to make CREATE DATABASE enforce
encoding-vs-locale match --- if you try to load the dump into a server
with a different default locale, it'll probably fail, and there's
absolutely no reason why it should.

2. There seem to be some corner cases where creating a table in the new
database will not create a toast table even though there was one in the
previous instance.  (I'm not 100% convinced that this can happen if we
create and then drop dropped columns, for instance ... but I'm not
convinced it can't happen, either.)  If there is a toast table in the
old database then pg_migrator must bring it over because it might
possibly contain live data.  However, as toasting.c is presently coded
there is no way to force it to create a toast table.  I think we should
change AlterTableCreateToastTable to add a "bool force" parameter.
Alternatively we could add a separate entry point, but the option seems
a bit cleaner.

Barring objections I'll commit changes for both of these before beta2.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Heikki Linnakangas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4796: Recovery followed by backup creates unrecoverable WAL-file
Следующее
От: "Kevin Grittner"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Serializable Isolation without blocking