Re: [GENERAL] idle in transaction, why
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [GENERAL] idle in transaction, why |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19493.1510000892@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [GENERAL] idle in transaction, why (Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [GENERAL] idle in transaction, why
|
| Список | pgsql-general |
Rob Sargent <robjsargent@gmail.com> writes:
> idle_in_transaction_session_timeout | 0 | default |
> | | A value of 0 turns off the timeout. | user
Meh. I think we're barking up the wrong tree anyway: so far as I can
find, there is no error message reading 'idle transaction timeout'
in the existing PG sources (and I sure hope no committer would have
thought that such an ambiguous message text was satisfactory).
So I think your error is coming from client-side or third-party code.
What other moving parts have you got in there?
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления: