Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Personally I think it would be just fine if we had only the wiki copy
>> and forgot about shipping it in tarballs.
> The problem with not shipping the TODO file at all is that TODO gives
> users a list of all known bugs/missing features in that major release.
This seems to me to be nonsense. You've never maintained the
back-branch versions of the TODO list, so they're out of date anyway
--- ie, they don't account for problems discovered post-release.
In any case I've always thought that the TODO was developer-oriented
documentation, not something users would read. If there's a shortcoming
in a feature, it ought to be documented in the SGML manual.
regards, tom lane