Re: Performance monitor
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Performance monitor |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 19312.984496760@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Performance monitor (Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Performance monitor
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Denis Perchine <dyp@perchine.com> writes:
>>> Small question... Will it work in console? Or it will be X only?
>>
>> It will be tck/tk, so I guess X only.
> That's bad.
tcl/tk is cross-platform; there's no reason that a tcl-coded
performance monitor client couldn't run on Windows or Mac.
The real problem with the ps-based implementation that Bruce is
proposing is that it cannot work remotely at all, because there's
no way to get the ps data from another machine (unless you're
oldfashioned/foolish enough to be running a finger server that
allows remote ps). This I think is the key reason why we'll
ultimately want to forget about ps and go to a shared-memory-based
arrangement for performance info. That could support a client/server
architecture where the server is a backend process (or perhaps a
not-quite-backend process, but anyway attached to shared memory)
and the client is communicating with it over TCP.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: