Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> test=> SELECT pg_class.* LIMIT 0;
> NOTICE: adding missing FROM-clause entry for table "pg_class"
> Is this what we want? I don't think so. I thought we wanted to
> maintain the backward-compatible syntax of no FROM clause.
Well, the discussion earlier in the week concluded that
add_missing_from=true should emit a notice in every case where
add_missing_from=false would fail. Do you want to argue against
that conclusion?
regards, tom lane