RE: WAL & RC1 status

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Matthew
Тема RE: WAL & RC1 status
Дата
Msg-id 183FA749499ED311B6550000F87E206C1FD037@srv.ctlno.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на WAL & RC1 status  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers

> From:    Bruce Momjian [SMTP:pgman@candle.pha.pa.us]
> Sent:    Friday, March 02, 2001 9:54 AM
> To:    Tom Lane
> Cc:    pgsql-core@postgresql.org; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> Subject:    Re: [HACKERS] WAL & RC1 status
> 
> > Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > > Is there a version number in the WAL file?
> > 
> > catversion.h will do fine, no?
> > 
> > > Can we put conditional code in there to create
> > > new log file records with an updated format?
> > 
> While it may be unfortunate to have to do an initdb at this point in
the beta cycle, it is a beta and that is part of the deal.  Postgre has the
reputation of being the highest quality opensource database and we should do
nothing to tarnish that.  Release it when it's ready and not before.


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL & RC1 status
Следующее
От: Thomas Lockhart
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [ODBC] Re: Release in 2 weeks ...