Re: updated emacs configuration

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Robert Haas escribi�:
>> I don't have any comment on that specific point, but I took a quick
>> look through one of these diffs and it looks like a lot of churn for
>> no improvement.  So I'm not sure what we want to do here, but I don't
>> think it's this.

> I, on the contrary, think that the cases that are preceded by a period
> are an improvement, and the rest are not (the opposite, actually, so
> better not change those).  Maybe there are specific cases in which a
> period-tab sequence should be kept, but that seems rarer.

I concur with Alvaro; the only cases I want to see changed are period
followed by a tab that would be exactly two spaces.
        regards, tom lane