Re: [HACKERS] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 18034.1290714129@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements (Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda@truviso.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] JDBC and Binary protocol error, for some statements
|
| Список | pgsql-jdbc |
Maciek Sakrejda <msakrejda@truviso.com> writes:
>> But to the last part of cited protocol specification, when I've sent message with statement parameter's type int4,
int8,varchar the format
>> field wasn't set to 0, but 1.
> I wasn't able to reproduce that with my standalone test case. When I
> changed the parameter oid to 23, I still got the same behavior. Can
> you alter my test case to reproduce the error?
I'd be really surprised if that affected the server-side behavior.
OTOH, it seems possible that the JDBC driver might behave differently
depending on whether parameter types were prespecified or not --- it
might issue Describe earlier in order to get the parameter types,
perhaps.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления: