Re: DROP TYPE/DROP DOMAIN
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: DROP TYPE/DROP DOMAIN |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17765.1060176824@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: DROP TYPE/DROP DOMAIN ("Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>) |
| Ответы |
Re: DROP TYPE/DROP DOMAIN
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"Christopher Kings-Lynne" <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au> writes:
> But should the CREATE DOMAIN manual page refer to DROP TYPE? Should DROP
> DOMAIN be able to drop a type?
<shrug> Don't care much about either of those; the current state of
affairs is fine with me.
> What happens in the future if for some
> reason we need to add some special case to dropDomain() and the coder
> neglects to add it to dropType()?
That would be a bug without regard for any of this discussion, because
both RemoveDomain and RemoveType are simply user interface routines;
they do no actual work. If someone put actual work into either, it'd
be wrong because it would not get done during a cascaded drop.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: