Re: PG15 beta1 sort performance regression due to Generation context change

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On 2022-05-24 12:01:58 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> For back-patching into v14, we could put the new NodeTag type at the
>> end of that enum list.  The change in the inline GetMemoryChunkContext
>> is probably an acceptable hazard.

> Why would we backpatch this to 14? I don't think we have any regressions
> there?

Oh, sorry, I meant v15.  I'm operating on the assumption that we have
at least a weak ABI freeze in v15 already.

            regards, tom lane