Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )
Дата
Msg-id 17661.1293472202@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Ответы Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )  (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>)
Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of lun dic 27 13:54:56 -0300 2010:
>> [ lightbulb ] ... although we could improve that quite a bit if we
>> processed each .h file separately instead of insisting on smashing
>> everything into one compilation.  Let me go try that.

> FWIW I have this patch lingering about that I wrote months ago, to check
> for header problems (not C++ stuff, just things like forgetting to
> include some necessary header in some other header).  Since it needs a
> lot of polish (needs to ignore certain headers, and avoid leave
> lingering files around), I didn't commit it; and I haven't updated it to
> the new Make recursive stuff, either.

src/tools/pginclude/ already contains several scripts for this sort of
thing.  Bruce runs them by hand occasionally, although I just found out
that he's evidently not run the does-each-header-compile-standalone
test in awhile.  It would probably pay to automate these.
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Eisentraut
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )
Следующее
От: Magnus Hagander
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: C++ keywords in headers (was Re: [GENERAL] #include )