Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17649.1227535357@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation
Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation Re: blatantly a bug in the documentation |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net> writes:
> Dave Page wrote:
>> It might also be useful to create such a database at initdb time so
>> newbies have something interesting to look at right away.
> No, there is no need to clutter every installation in the world with
> such a database. You could make it an addon module, or a pgfoundry project.
The whole thing strikes me as extreme overkill, not to mention a
misunderstanding of what an example is supposed to be for. If we're
going to insist that every example in the docs work when
copied-and-pasted into an empty database, then simple and to-the-point
examples will be history. Instead of one-liners we'll have clutter.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: