Re: Fast default stuff versus pg_upgrade

Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> writes:
> On June 21, 2018 9:04:28 AM PDT, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> This isn't really ready to go.  One clear problem is that you broke
>> pg_dump'ing from any pre-v11 version, because you did not add suitable
>> null outputs to the pre-v11 query variants in getTableAttrs.

> Thought the same for a bit - think it's OK though, because there a check for PQfnumber being bigger than 0...

It won't actually crash, but it will spit out lots of ugly warnings.

            regards, tom lane