Re: small pg_basebackup display bug
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: small pg_basebackup display bug |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 17451.1355682053@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: small pg_basebackup display bug (Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: small pg_basebackup display bug
Re: small pg_basebackup display bug |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus@hagander.net> writes:
> On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Erik Rijkers <er@xs4all.nl> wrote:
>> That would make such a truncation less frequent, and after all a truncated display is not
>> particular useful.
> Agreed - it's useful during testing, but not in a typical production
> use. It might actually be more useful if it's truncated in in the
> other end (keeping the last 30 instead of the first 30 chars)
+1 for truncating from the left. I think pg_upgrade already does that
in its progress messages.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: