Re: Do we need a TODO? (was Re: Concurrently updating anupdatable view)

"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> I'm sorry guys but I don't agree this is a TODO item.
...
> Also, methinks we should have agreed behaviour before we make something
> a TODO item.

There is a whole *lot* of stuff in the TODO list that does not have a
consensus solution yet.  You should not imagine that it's gospel.

At the same time, it'd be better if this item were worded more like
"investigate this issue" rather than presupposing a particular
form of answer.
        regards, tom lane