Pat Heuvel <pheuvel@tpg.com.au> writes:
> [ vacuumlo fails ]
> When I added the -v option, there were many "removing lo xxxxx" messages
> before the above messages appeared. I have previously tried to reindex
> pg_largeobject, but that process failed as well.
You need to get the index consistent before trying vacuumlo; that
program is not designed to deal with inconsistent catalogs.
What exactly happens when you try to reindex pg_largeobject?
regards, tom lane