Re: Fix XML handling with DOCTYPE

Chapman Flack <chap@anastigmatix.net> writes:
> On 03/23/19 16:59, Tom Lane wrote:
>> You're not really validating that the input
>> is something that libxml would accept, unless its processing of XML PIs
>> is far stupider than I would expect it to be.

> Out of curiosity, what further processing would you expect libxml to do?

Hm, I'd have thought it'd try to parse the arguments to some extent,
but maybe not.  Does everybody reimplement attribute parsing for
themselves when using PIs?

            regards, tom lane