Re: timetz range check issue

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: timetz range check issue
Дата
Msg-id 17025.1198300572@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на timetz range check issue  (Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>)
Ответы Re: timetz range check issue  (Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Andrew Chernow <ac@esilo.com> writes:
> I think a range check is needed in timetz_recv & time_recv.

I think that the design philosophy for the binary I/O code is to be as
fast as safely possible, and accordingly range-checks are present only
where needed for the backend to defend itself.  Is there anything that
goes horribly wrong if a client shoves a bad zone offset at us?

(If we want to change this philosophy, I won't necessarily quibble,
but I don't think these two recv routines are the only ones that
would need to be tightened up.)
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Improve wording.
Следующее
От: "Francisco"
Дата:
Сообщение: binary decode