Re: range_agg

On 5/3/19 6:41 PM, David Fetter wrote:
> This suggests two different ways to extend ranges over aggregation:
> one which is a union of (in general) disjoint intervals, two others
> are a union of intervals, each of which has a weight.
> . . .
> I think the cases above, or at least the first two of them, should be
> available. They could be called range_agg, weighted_range_agg, and
> covering_range_agg.

Thanks David! I think these two new functions make sense. Before I 
implement them too I wonder if anyone else has uses for them?

Thanks,

-- 
Paul              ~{:-)
pj@illuminatedcomputing.com