Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc
Дата
Msg-id 16878.1455584235@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc  (Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com>)
Ответы Re: postgres_fdw vs. force_parallel_mode on ppc  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
Noah Misch <noah@leadboat.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2016 at 07:31:40PM -0500, Robert Haas wrote:
>> Oh, crap.  I didn't realize that TEMP_CONFIG didn't affect the contrib
>> test suites.  Is there any reason for that, or is it just kinda where
>> we ended up?

> To my knowledge, it's just the undesirable place we ended up.

Yeah.  +1 for fixing that, if it's not unreasonably painful.
        regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Introduce group locking to prevent parallel processes from deadl
Следующее
От: Greg Stark
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: A bit of PG archeology uncovers an interesting Linux/Unix factoid