Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Дата
Msg-id 1652.1093633427@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
Ответы Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()  ("Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net>)
Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()  (Andrew Dunstan <andrew@dunslane.net>)
Список pgsql-patches
"Ed L." <pgsql@bluepolka.net> writes:
> On Friday August 27 2004 12:41, Tom Lane wrote:
>> BTW, as long as we are taking Apache as the de facto standard --- does
>> the default of "postgresql-%Y-%m-%d_%H%M%S.log" actually make sense, or
>> would something different be closer to the common practice with Apache?

> I should say, Apache rotatelogs takes a configurable filename and then
> appends ".N" where N is the logfile start time epoch.  In one case, its
> access_log.N, in another its error_log.N.

Hmm ... there isn't any way to emulate that with strftime escapes,
unless I missed the right one.

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-patches по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()
Следующее
От: "Ed L."
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: log_filename_prefix --> log_filename + strftime()