Marc G. Fournier writes:> I think at this late stage in the game (almost 10 years), changing could> be a bit difficult
andconfusing, no? :) I'd go with something like> pgsqld myself though, keeps it short ... or we could go even shorter
with>just pgd ...> > But, I'm not, in any stretch of the imagination, advocating for change on> this ...
If it's ever going to happen then the likely place would be in a Linux
distribution or a re-package of PostgreSQL. I'm sure no one would be
suprised if Red Hat had a new release with dbd, ~db, sql (or keeping
PostgreSQL in it pgsqld, ~pgsql, pgsql)...
Indeed a lot of the current inconsistencies are packaging issues...
L.