Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>On Fri, 16 Jan 2004, Thomas Swan wrote:
>
>
>
>>Perhaps postgresd, postgresqld, or pg_daemon might be a little more
>>intuitive?
>>
>>
>
>I think at this late stage in the game (almost 10 years), changing could
>be a bit difficult and confusing, no? :) I'd go with something like
>pgsqld myself though, keeps it short ... or we could go even shorter with
>just pgd ...
>
>But, I'm not, in any stretch of the imagination, advocating for change on
>this ...
>
>
>
Agreed, to change it would be a bit insane. Although a little insanity
often surrounds a major version release...
I just thought the anecdote of confusing it for an MTA was a little funny.
Thomas