Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Дата
Msg-id 16304.1316364212@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
Ответы Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Список pgsql-hackers
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On sön, 2011-09-18 at 09:45 -0500, Dave Page wrote:
>> That is much more reasonable, though unfortunately not what was said.
>> Regardless, I stand by my main point that such a representative should
>> be communicating with the project regularly. Having a rep who works
>> outside the project is of no use at all. 

> Well, the point of this thread is, how can she communicate?

+1 for a closed mailing list.  It's a bit annoying to have to do such
a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for
appropriate purposes.  I guess the real question is, exactly what will
be the requirements for joining?
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: /proc/self/oom_adj is deprecated in newer Linux kernels
Следующее
От: David Rinaldi
Дата:
Сообщение: Grouping Sets