Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16304.1316364212@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard?
Re: Is there really no interest in SQL Standard? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> On sön, 2011-09-18 at 09:45 -0500, Dave Page wrote:
>> That is much more reasonable, though unfortunately not what was said.
>> Regardless, I stand by my main point that such a representative should
>> be communicating with the project regularly. Having a rep who works
>> outside the project is of no use at all.
> Well, the point of this thread is, how can she communicate?
+1 for a closed mailing list. It's a bit annoying to have to do such
a thing, but it's not like we haven't got other closed lists for
appropriate purposes. I guess the real question is, exactly what will
be the requirements for joining?
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: