Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 16175.1386258393@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? ("MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server
log?
Re: [RFC] Shouldn't we remove annoying FATAL messages from server log? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
"MauMau" <maumau307@gmail.com> writes:
> Shouldn't we lower the severity or avoiding those messages to server log?
No. They are FATAL so far as the individual session is concerned.
Possibly some documentation effort is needed here, but I don't think
any change in the code behavior would be an improvement.
> 1. FATAL: the database system is starting up
> 2. FATAL: the database system is shutting down
> 3. FATAL: the database system is in recovery mode
> 4. FATAL: sorry, too many clients already
> Report these as FATAL to the client because the client wants to know the
> reason. But don't output them to server log because they are not necessary
> for DBAs (4 is subtle.)
The notion that a DBA should not be allowed to find out how often #4 is
happening is insane.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: