Re: Custom variables and flags, again
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: Custom variables and flags, again |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15925.1226887663@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: Custom variables and flags, again (ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp>) |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki.takahiro@oss.ntt.co.jp> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Perhaps more to the point, guc_tables.h is a file that we don't even
>> want the majority of the backend including. Why would we think it's
>> a good idea to make that part of the public API to external modules?
> Hmmm... do we need to move config_group enumerations to guc.h from
> guc_tables.h ? Or, we cannot expose the group field and always use
> CUSTOM_OPTIONS for custom variables.
My inclination is not to expose that, and just use CUSTOM_OPTIONS
always. As was noted earlier, the config_group enumeration seems
really ad-hoc and subject to change, so keeping external modules away
from it seems the best thing to me.
We do need to move some of the GUC flags #defines (not sure about all
of them...) into guc.h, if we want to take the position that external
modules shouldn't import guc_tables.h.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: