Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops
Дата
Msg-id
15789.1504878289@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Neto pr <netopr9@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Neto pr <netopr9@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Neto pr <netopr9@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Neto pr  writes:
> After analyzing, I saw that in some places of the plan, it is being used
> Parallelism. Does this explain why the final value spent (in minutes) to go
> through the index (184 minutes) is greater than the total query time (66
> minutes)?

I was just about to ask you about that.  If this is under a Gather node,
I believe that the numbers include time expended in all processes.
So if you had three or more workers these results would make sense.
		regards, tom lane


-- 
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления
От: Neto pr
Дата:
От: Neto pr
Дата:
FAQ