Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops
От
Tom Lane
Тема
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops
Дата
Msg-id
15789.1504878289@sss.pgh.pa.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Neto pr <netopr9@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Igor Neyman <ineyman@perceptron.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Neto pr <netopr9@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Neto pr <netopr9@gmail.com>
Re: [PERFORM] Explain Analyze - actual time in loops Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Neto pr writes: > After analyzing, I saw that in some places of the plan, it is being used > Parallelism. Does this explain why the final value spent (in minutes) to go > through the index (184 minutes) is greater than the total query time (66 > minutes)? I was just about to ask you about that. If this is under a Gather node, I believe that the numbers include time expended in all processes. So if you had three or more workers these results would make sense. regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления