Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum
Дата
Msg-id 15625.1064587933@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum  (Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>)
Ответы Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum  (Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu>)
Re: [ADMIN] postgres 6.2 vacuum  (Jan Wieck <JanWieck@Yahoo.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Lamar Owen <lowen@pari.edu> writes:
> This isn't necessarily true.  That old of a version of PostgreSQL is probably
> running on a quite out-of-date OS -- for instance, if the OS was Red Hat 
> Linux, then the point at which 6.2.1 was shipped was RHL 5.0.  Can you even 
> compile PostgreSQL 7.3.x on RHL 5.0 or its contemporaries?

Surely.  We still support other platforms that make RHL 5.0 look like
the new kid on the block.  There might not be RPMs available, but I
can't believe it wouldn't compile from source.

I do agree that people running that old a Linux distro need to think
about updating more than just Postgres, though.  They have kernel bugs
as well as PG bugs to fear :-(
        regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Threads vs Processes
Следующее
От: Shridhar Daithankar
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Threads vs Processes