Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
| От | Tom Lane |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 15608.1485220543@sss.pgh.pa.us обсуждение |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? (Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default?
Re: [HACKERS] Checksums by default? |
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net> writes:
> * Jim Nasby (Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com) wrote:
>> As others have mentioned, right now practically no one enables this,
>> so we've got zero data on how useful it might actually be.
> Uhm, Peter G just said that Heroku enables this on all their databases
> and have yet to see a false-positive report or an issue with having it
> enabled.
> That, plus the reports and evidence we've seen in the past couple days,
> look like a pretty ringing endorsement for having them.
You must have read a different Peter G than I did. What I read was
>> I don't recall ever seeing a checksum failure on a Heroku Postgres
>> database,
which did not sound like an endorsement to me.
regards, tom lane
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: