Re: vacuum and autovacuum - is it good to configure the thresholdat TABLE LEVEL?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От rajan
Тема Re: vacuum and autovacuum - is it good to configure the thresholdat TABLE LEVEL?
Дата
Msg-id 1543820419618-0.post@n3.nabble.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: vacuum and autovacuum - is it good to configure the thresholdat TABLE LEVEL?  (rajan <vgmonnet@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: vacuum and autovacuum - is it good to configure the threshold atTABLE LEVEL?  (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Hello Amul,

I have a doubt. Please find below the details,

1. autovacuum_vacuum_threshold and autovacuum_analyse_threshold are set at
300
2. autovacuum_vacuum_scale_factor and autovacuum_analyse_scale_face are set
at 300
3. there is table which has only 6 records
4. and the number of updates happened in the table is 944
5. now when I fetch data from pg_stat_user_table, i find that only
last_autoanalyse column is updated with datetime and last_autovacuum column
is not having a value

does this mean only autoanalyse was executed for this table? But when I have
both vacuum_threshold and analyse_threshold set at 300, how can only analyse
run and vacuum does not?

This may be a stupid question. But any answer can help me understand.



-----
--
Thanks,
Rajan.
--
Sent from: http://www.postgresql-archive.org/PostgreSQL-hackers-f1928748.html


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pgsql: Avoid duplicate XIDs at recovery when building initialsnapshot
Следующее
От: Fabien COELHO
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: doc - improve description of default privileges