Re: [v9.4] row level security

Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2013 at 10:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> Well, the security-barrier view stuff did not present itself as a 100%
>> solution.  But perhaps more to the point, it was conceptually simple to
>> implement, ie don't flatten views if they have this bit set, and don't
>> push down quals into such sub-selects unless they're marked leakproof.

> Right.  IMHO, this new feature should be similarly simple: when an
> unprivileged user references a table, treat that as a reference to a
> leakproof view over the table, with the RLS qual injected into the
> view.

And for insert/update/delete, we do what exactly?
        regards, tom lane