Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Nathan Bossart
Тема Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval
Дата
Msg-id 154117002849.5569.14588306221618961668.pgcf@coridan.postgresql.org
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval  (Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>)
Ответы Re: Use durable_unlink for .ready and .done files for WAL segmentremoval  (Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi.kyotaro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Список pgsql-hackers
One argument for instead checking WAL file existence before calling
archive_command might be to avoid the increased startup time.
Granted, any added delay from this patch is unlikely to be noticeable
unless your archiver is way behind and archive_status has a huge
number of files.  However, I have seen cases where startup is stuck on
other tasks like SyncDataDirectory() and RemovePgTempFiles() for a
very long time, so perhaps it is worth considering.

Nathan

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PG vs macOS Mojave
Следующее
От: Petr Jelinek
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: replication_slots usability issue