Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints inpostgres_fdw

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints inpostgres_fdw
Дата
Msg-id 1531094418.21382.3.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw  (Etsuro Fujita <fujita.etsuro@lab.ntt.co.jp>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Another oddity in handling of WCO constraints in postgres_fdw
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Tue, 2018-03-06 at 20:09 +0900, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
> Agreed.  I added a comment to that function.  I think that that
> comment 
> in combination with changes to the FDW docs in the patch would help
> FDW 
> authors understand why that is needed.  Please find attached an
> updated 
> version of the patch.
> 
> Thanks for the comments!

Committed.

I made some small modifications and added a test for the case where the
foreign table is a partition of a local table, which follows a
different code path after commit 3d956d95.

Thank you!

Regards,
    Jeff Davis

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
Сообщение: "Write amplification" is made worse by "getting tired" whileinserting into nbtree secondary indexes (Was: Why B-Tree suffix truncation matters)
Следующее
От: Sean Chittenden
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: WAL prefetch